svcShredditStylingOverrides
| Domain | community |
| Kind | endpoint |
| doc_id | — |
| Path | /svc/shreddit/styling-overrides |
| Sends | — |
| Reads | — |
| Called from | runs/inspect/20261025T124815_MaleficentTry8338/script0.js:44 anonymous |
| rea | ev_12bce587ea2b77c3b78c6903f14b7897a0e8b62e18d85f1a74650c915d8a117b |
Seen 7 time(s) in 1 run(s).
| Action | Our step | Times | Status | Took | After step start | Errors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| inspect | step 1: goto / | 1 | 200 | 3468 ms | 3475 ms | — |
| inspect | step 3: goto /r/AskReddit/ | 1 | 200 | 536 ms | 4662 ms | — |
| inspect | step 5: goto /search/ | 1 | 200 | 338 ms | 1324 ms | — |
| inspect | step 6: goto /r/AskReddit/comments/1x8sr8s/whats_a_high_paying_but_soul_crushing_career_th | 1 | 200 | 332 ms | 1059 ms | — |
| inspect | step 10: goto /user/Maleficent-Try-8338/ | 1 | 200 | 591 ms | 1268 ms | — |
| inspect | step 11: goto /notifications | 1 | 200 | 305 ms | 1591 ms | — |
| inspect | step 12: goto /r/popular/ | 1 | 200 | 333 ms | 803 ms | — |
What it sent and what came back (the newest 3 from our runs)
Read from each run's own recording (rule 73), secrets and signed link tokens taken out. Kept in ~/.logCli/rea/clientFacts.json, so it stays after the run is pruned.
runs/inspect/20261025T124815_MaleficentTry8338, step 1: goto /: 200, 3468 ms
Sent:
{
"query": {
"v": "0"
},
"body": null
}Answered:
[]runs/inspect/20261025T124815_MaleficentTry8338, step 3: goto /r/AskReddit/: 200, 536 ms
Sent:
{
"query": {
"v": "0"
},
"body": null
}Answered:
[]runs/inspect/20261025T124815_MaleficentTry8338, step 5: goto /search/: 200, 338 ms
Sent:
{
"query": {
"v": "0"
},
"body": null
}Answered:
[]What it does
This call is part of the page's ad-block check. The slice first asks nu() whether an ad blocker and acceptable ads are on, packs the result into v with lu({isAdblockEnabled, isEyeoPartnered, isAcceptableAdsEnabled}), and fetches /svc/shreddit/styling-overrides/?v=… (rea ev_12bce587…, whose one finding is this endpoint). In every recorded call we sent v=0 and got back an empty list, so no styling was changed. It fired on every page we opened.
What our machine does with it
log-cli's Reddit platform has only log reddit session check (the direct-API engine, with no Reddit client vendored yet) and log inspect in the account's AdsPower browser with no proxy (rule 84). Nothing waits on this call yet: inspect records it and names it in each step's exchanges.json, and SubQ reads it with the rest of the step. If log-cli acts on Reddit, v=0 is worth keeping an eye on: it is what the page reports about ad blocking in our AdsPower browser, and a different value would mean the browser started to look different.
What can go wrong
All seven recorded calls answered 200, the first in 3468 ms and the rest in 305-591 ms. The fetch sits in a try with an empty catch, so a failure is ignored completely and never stops the page or a run.