SubQ matrix: how REA meets this Camoufox session

Run 2026-10-18. Model subq-snap-preview, POST https://api.subq.ai/v1/systemone. State was 83,051 characters: spec.md, the three Parallel reports, the client and comparison notes, the identity-leak status table, and python/browser/visibleBrowser.py. 279,432 input tokens. Both repeats of the choice pass and both repeats of the claim pass returned the same answer. Raw output: subqResults.json. Rerun: node docs/rea/matrix/runMatrix.mjs.

The Decisions API allows 1–16 questions. This run used 16 criteria, 8 options and 10 claims. Docs read the same day: https://docs.subq.ai/markdown/endpoints/decisions-api.md.

Winner

harAndScripts. The gated Camoufox session writes a HAR and the script bodies. Stock rea-agents reads the files offline. It won every criterion on both passes.

Mean score 3.59 of 4. The next options were scripts only (3.34), HAR only (3.25), and doing nothing (2.66). Forking REA for Juggler (1.88), switching to Chrome (1.82), exposing CDP on Camoufox (1.63) and copying Listaro's AdsPower attach (1.58) lost.

The close calls, still won by harAndScripts:

CriterionProbabilityNext
effort0.42HAR only, 0.37
reversible0.61do nothing, 0.21
public evidence0.73(still first)

Lowest scores for the winner: secret safety 2.74, effort 2.96, testability 3.15. A HAR can hold cookies. The capture has to strip them before the file is written. That is not done yet. Nothing in this run records a HAR.

Claims (probability true, both passes)

Claimp
REA page tools are Chrome CDP, not Firefox0.984
HAR inspection never fetches URLs0.983
Listaro's poster is AdsPower CDP, not Camoufox0.982
NativeResponseAdapter does not call Facebook0.982
Canvas hash and shared GPU pixels are still open0.978
No public Juggler or Camoufox provider in REA0.970
No verified public REA investigation of a Meta product0.967
CDP disconnect can clear navigator.platform0.943
humanize must be a float because a boolean hangs0.860
A Playwright HAR is a documented REA input0.624

The last two are the ones not to over-read.

Upstream Camoufox documents humanize as True or a float (https://camoufox.com/python/usage/). Pull request 682 on daijro/camoufox says True turns humanize on without setting humanize:maxTime, and a number sets that maximum. Our client still passes 1.5 because facebook-camofox-client records that a boolean hangs mouse.move on the build we run (session_manager.py). The 0.86 is that split: local bug note versus the public signature. Do not change HUMANIZE_MAX_SECONDS on the back of this matrix.

0.624 on the HAR claim means SubQ would not treat "Playwright's HAR is exactly what REA accepts" as shown. REA's own doc says HAR 1.2, and it notes Playwright can emit postData.text: null. The next proof is one fixture HAR through rea inspect-web-network-capture, not a live account.

What was not found

The meta report's own line: no verified public REA command against Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger, Marketplace, or the Graph API in the window 14 April 2026 to 18 October 2026. Issue search hits (#3667, #2238, #4004) are leads, not implementations. A Facebook group post about REA is an announcement hosted on Facebook, not an analysis of Facebook.

Marketplace scrapers turned up as separate Playwright projects (passivebot/facebook-marketplace-scraper, SPolton/fb-marketplace-scraper, and others). The report did not verify their launch files, and none of them use REA. They are not a template for this client.