sharedInvitesCanGetLink
| Domain | activity |
| Kind | mutation |
| doc_id | — |
| Path | /api/sharedInvites.canGetLink |
| Sends | `------WebKitFormBoundaryvWif171cs16fn9fD |
Content-Disposition: form-data; name, ------WebKitFormBoundaryKVEHomBzWCV4cyPi | |
| Content-Disposition: form-data; name` | |
| Reads | ok, is_eligible |
| Called from | runs/inspect/20261103T065639_mattSlack/script35.js:275 anonymous, runs/inspect/20261103T065639_mattSlack/script3.js:2878 statement |
| rea | ev_2906b68ca898d9b503bd70e2e03c98ea207957870def4d3f71556b63a336e441 |
Seen 2 time(s) in 1 run(s).
| Action | Our step | Times | Status | Took | After step start | Errors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| inspect | step 4: goto /client | 1 | 200 | 300 ms | 8940 ms | — |
| inspect | step 6: goto /client/T0C4VCD06MR/D0C8VAE7REU | 1 | 200 | 293 ms | 7200 ms | — |
What it sent and what came back (the newest 2 from our runs)
Read from each run's own recording (rule 73), secrets and signed link tokens taken out. Kept in ~/.logCli/rea/clientFacts.json, so it stays after the run is pruned.
runs/inspect/20261103T065639_mattSlack, step 4: goto /client: 200, 300 ms
Sent:
{
"query": {
"_x_id": "2c6eaecf-1793689066.270",
"_x_gantry": "true",
"_x_desktop_ia": "4",
"slack_route": "T0C4VCD06MR",
"_x_version_ts": "1793684253",
"_x_foreground": "true",
"_x_frontend_build_type": "current",
"fp": "6f",
"_x_num_retries": "0"
},
"body": {
"------WebKitFormBoundaryvWif171cs16fn9fD\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name": "\"token\"\r\n\r\nxoxc-12165421006739-12156263517591-12492529441700-5bffe6e6a317b9bbab53d938a4526d20e882de6ab372cd46f9f90868bb0322a0\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryvWif171cs16fn9fD\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name=\"_x_reason\"\r\n\r\nsidebar-mount\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryvWif171cs16fn9fD\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name=\"_x_mode\"\r\n\r\nonline\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryvWif171cs16fn9fD\r\nContent-Disposition: f… (583 chars)"
}
}Answered:
{
"ok": true,
"is_eligible": true
}runs/inspect/20261103T065639_mattSlack, step 6: goto /client/T0C4VCD06MR/D0C8VAE7REU: 200, 293 ms
Sent:
{
"query": {
"_x_id": "2c6eaecf-1793689122.282",
"_x_gantry": "true",
"_x_desktop_ia": "4",
"_x_csid": "aVvVPXA0sak",
"slack_route": "T0C4VCD06MR",
"_x_version_ts": "1793684253",
"_x_foreground": "true",
"_x_frontend_build_type": "current",
"fp": "6f",
"_x_num_retries": "0"
},
"body": {
"------WebKitFormBoundaryKVEHomBzWCV4cyPi\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name": "\"token\"\r\n\r\nxoxc-12165421006739-12156263517591-12492529441700-5bffe6e6a317b9bbab53d938a4526d20e882de6ab372cd46f9f90868bb0322a0\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryKVEHomBzWCV4cyPi\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name=\"_x_reason\"\r\n\r\nsidebar-mount\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryKVEHomBzWCV4cyPi\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name=\"_x_mode\"\r\n\r\nonline\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryKVEHomBzWCV4cyPi\r\nContent-Disposition: f… (583 chars)"
}
}Answered:
{
"ok": true,
"is_eligible": true
}What it does
Asks whether the user may create a shared invite link, although it is typed a mutation here: it answered ok: true, is_eligible: true, on step 4 goto /client (300 ms) and step 6 goto the DM (293 ms). It only checks eligibility.
What our machine does with it
Nothing: no log-cli code calls it. The engine (python/slackApi/engine.py, actions ping, workspaces, chats, read, send, watch over vendor/gabrielSlack) never uses this endpoint; it is Slack's web client's own traffic, seen only because the log inspect AdsPower run on mattSlack loaded the page.
What can go wrong
Both calls were 200. An ok: false or is_eligible: false would only hide the invite-people prompt in the client; nothing of ours acts on it.